intimacy?

Date: 2005-08-17 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I feel the need to scold you in much the same way I scolded L for not telling me about your blog. Perhaps you did a long time ago and I forgot. Perhaps I said something snotty about the blogs of some crazy people you had to deal with a year ago and you decided not to tell me.

Regardless, here are my thoughts:

Sexual chemistry is sexual chemistry. It either happens, or it doesn't. I'm sure some person would have sexual chemistry with that ego-centric sexual pseudo-deity you had to deal with (granted, not a person I that I would ever want to encounter in my universe, but whatever, they're out there. They deserve to get laid, too, as long as they're not republicans). Clearly, there was no real sexual chemistry with mr wannabe sex god, and he was extremely horny and willing to jump you, chemistry or not. It is a pattern amongst many of the male beasts.

I think over-sharing or 2 people not being in sync about the boundaries and progression of a relationship in its various stages is the scary thing. I don't know if I think "instant intimacy" is what I find scary-- sometimes people are very intimate with one another very quickly because they just happen to be in sync.

Hmm . . blathering. There's my two cents.

I miss you and L :(

M
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

arguchik: (Default)
arguchik

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 06:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios