Date: 2006-10-13 05:42 pm (UTC)
i've heard very good things--from my brother and now from you--about canon's cameras. i was looking at their $300 model, which has very similar features (6 megapixels, rechargeable battery, 3X optical zoom...) as a nikon model that goes for $350. the only differences, as far as i can tell, are that the nikon has 21 MB of internal memory, and the lens doesn't protrude from the camera. i have no idea what difference this makes, since i would need to get a much larger memory card (probably 512 MB) for either camera. those go for about $30, so that would put me at $330 for the canon vs. $380 for the nikon (plus tax, of course, which is substantial in seattle).
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

arguchik: (Default)
arguchik

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 04:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios